Click
Here
for more articles |
|
|
Can
Western Medicine Accept Chinese Medicine? |
by:
Brian
B. Carter, MS, LAc |
Q: My
doctor is skeptical of Chinese medicine.
Is there a way to make it acceptable to
the western medicine way of thinking?
A: This is a complicated issue. Ideally,
we could use scientific research to make
this possible. This has been done to some
extent. However, there are still problems
with research and its acceptance.
Not Testing Authentic Chinese Medicine
Studies often diverge from authentic Chinese
medicine methodology. Investigators rarely
make use of pattern discrimination, which
is fundamental to Chinese medicine. Also,
studies have yet to acknowledge another
reality of CM - its plurality. There are
many ways to practice it, and many many
herb formulas, herb combinations, acupuncture
point combinations, and needling techniques.
See What You Want To See
Plus, studies of people reading and using
studies have proven that when we disagree
with a study's conclusions, we are much
more critical of its methodology and validity
than when the results agree with our beliefs.
That is a breakdown in the scientific method.
In the scientific method, we let study outcomes
revise our beliefs - not the other way around.
The Good Research That's Out There
If you want to see good acupuncture research,
and great commentary by an MD who devotes
his medical practice fully to acupuncture,
and who studies authentic CM, go to Acubriefs.com.
I did a short review of the best acupuncture
studies since the 1997 National Institutes
of Health statement.
Effectiveness and Proof are Secondary
An interesting twist: Historian and anthropologist
Paul Unschuld's suggests that the acceptance
of any medicine has more to do with how
it fits or doesn't fit with the social zeitgeist
(spirit of the times). People must understand
a medicine in a way that fits with their
beliefs and values first. Scientific evidence,
and personal experience of effectiveness
are secondary.
Acceptance by Western Medicine
But as for acceptance by western docs- it
depends on the doc. I doubt the AMA is going
to be accepting Chinese medicine as a separate
and equally valid medical system. But some
individual docs might.
Who Speaks For Western Medicine?
According to Modern Healthcare Magazine,
"Not counting medical students and residents,
who are lured by deep discounts in annual
dues, AMA members account for only about
29 per cent of 726,000 practicing doctors
in America."
This raises the question- who represents
most doctors? How do we know what they think
or want?
I did an internet search, both on Google
and Yahoo, for other medical organizations...
most of them were state, or country-oriented.
I did find a few others, but their membership
numbers may overlap:
The Christian Medical and Dental Associations
(CMDA) - 17,000 members
American College of Preventive Medicine
(ACPM) - 2,000 members
American Holistic Medicine Association (AHMA)
- membership not listed
So even though the AMA represents less than
one-third of physicians, it doesn't appear
that any other organization has nearly as
many members. Perhaps no one speaks for
Western medicine.
Pattern Discrimination Isn't So Strange
Besides all the distinct ontology (the study
of what exists) like meridians and organ-systems,
a fundamentally unique feature of CM (used
in China to differentiate CM from WM) is
pattern discrimination.
Different treatment for different symptom/sign
patterns is not really that strange. Western
docs don't give all patients the same antihypertensive
drugs, for example. It depends on the patient,
and there are specific groupings according
to symptoms, signs, and other diagnoses.
We do the same thing - just different groupings.
Regardless, many Western docs look down
their nose at pattern discrimination. Perhaps
they don't think it's scientific enough?
They don't see the benefit. It's outside
their paradigm.
Inequality in Credibility and Authority
Chinese medicine's biggest obstacle to making
progress politically and in the media is
that MD's are seen as the one true medical
authority. They are the experts on everything.
Pure scientists don't get as much attention,
nor do scholars, or Master's degree people.
Politicians and journalists both have this
perspective. Because of this, our objections
(to the actions of AMA, FDA, and drug companies
against Chinese herbal medicine) go unheard.
We are not seen as being as competent to
assess dangers. Nor do they take Chinese
docs very seriously. You have to either
be an MD or affiliated with a big institution.
So, to summarize, you can't convince some
people no matter what. Others will get behind
Chinese medicine regardless. Those in the
middle will be swayed by the media and their
friends.
It's going to take some time for enough
of us to have the degrees, affiliations,
and willingness to make statements loud
enough to be heard above the din of the
prevailing winds.
About the Author
Acupuncturist, herbalist, and medical
professor Brian B. Carter founded the
alternative health megasite The Pulse
of Oriental Medicine (http://www.PulseMed.org/).
He is the author of the book "Powerful
Body, Peaceful Mind: How to Heal Yourself
with Foods, Herbs, and Acupressure" (November,
2004). Brian speaks on radio across the
country, and has been quoted and interviewed
by Real Simple, Glamour, and ESPN magazines. |
|