Click
Here
for more articles |
|
|
In
Your Own Words |
by:
Elaine
Currie |
More
Tips For New Writers (Part I)
Explain in your own words
Familiar phrase? Yes, we have all heard
it many times in many different situations.
This little phrase is used to convey subtly
different meanings depending upon the circumstances
in which it is used. At school, the teacher
means "Don't just copy chunks out of a book;
show me you can write an essay". In an examination
the words mean "Prove that you understand
the question and know the answer". On an
insurance claim form it means "Tell us what
happened from your point of view". From
a Judge it means "Tell the truth without
embellishment".
What do all these people have in common?
They want to hear what you know, what you
think about things. They don't want something
you have copied from somebody else, they
don't want regurgitated chunks of something
learned by rote, they don't want to hear
somebody else's words repeated, they don't
want to hear excuses. They want to hear
what you have to say. They want honesty.
Honesty is the best policy
If you want to write, you must learn to
write honestly. By this I do not mean that
it is essential for you to always tell the
unvarnished truth (this article is not about
personal development: it is about writing
and moral debate has no place here). I mean
use your own words, your own style, your
own "voice". Do not try to imitate a writer
you admire. Imitation is said to be the
sincerest form of flattery. That may be
true enough but most imitations turn out
to be poor copies of the original item.
Make your writing the real deal; don't give
people the chance to say: "He's that guy
who tries to write like Stephen King". Believe
me, they won't mean it as a compliment;
what they are really saying is: "He's that
guy who tries to write like Stephen King
but fails and (snigger, snigger) he doesn't
realise it". Being honest has the undoubted
advantage that it saves you having to remember
what lies you told previously. It should
also make you feel good and that's a bonus.
There have, of course, been instances where
an unknown artist has created a painting
in the style of a master and the work had
been painted so skilfully that experts declared
it to be authentic. Remember, though, the
forger had skill of his own in the first
place. Whether you are forging a masterpiece
or a bank note, you need to possess skill
as well as the appropriate tools. If you
are new to writing, it is highly unlikely
that you will be able to manage a convincing
imitation of a famous author's style. Indeed,
you will probably find it difficult to even
begin to analyse what makes a particular
author's writing uniquely personal. Writing
"in the style of" can be a valuable exercise
for trainee writers but it should only ever
be an exercise, not a substitute for authenticity.
If you have what it takes to be a writer,
get out there, write and make sure your
fingerprints are all over your work declaring
it to be yours and yours alone.
Voice recognition
No, not the computer software type: the
type that happens when Joe `phones a friend.
Joe says: "Hello." and the friend instantly
says "Hi, Joe." If you write as yourself,
your loyal readers will reach the stage
where they recognise your work from reading
a fragment without needing any clue from
a by-line.
If you have something interesting to say,
there is no need to put on a phoney voice
(unless your intention is to make your audience
laugh). You will probably not get to be
President if you make all your speeches
in the style of Homer Simpson. If you decide
to put your message in writing, you should
write it in your own words and in your own
way. When you write, you have your own voice
and you should not try to disguise it. Allow
your audience to hear your voice and become
familiar with it. Of course not everybody
will like your voice one hundred percent
all of the time: there is not one thing
in this world which is liked by everybody
always.
None of us is perfect
I don't mean this in terms of never making
a mistake: I just mean that, as human beings
we all have imperfections. Keats says "Beauty
is truth, truth beauty". I heartily concur
but imperfections are, like beauty, in the
eye of the beholder; a matter of personal
taste. What is a blemish to you might be
an endearing feature to me. There are also
degrees of imperfection. A minor imperfection
in an otherwise excellent work may be overlooked.
A similar imperfection in bad piece of work
might be the final straw which prompts the
reader to throw the book across the room
and vow never to read anything else by that
author.
Whilst reading works of horror fiction by
some of my favourite fiction writers, I
have found the repeated use of certain words
irritating; for some reason I dislike the
use of "umbra" and "orb" in place of shadow
and eyeball. (The subject matter of these
books is of necessity dark and grisly things
frequently happen to eyes.) As the remainder
of the work is perfection (in my orbs, anyway)
I am able to forgive this minor irritation
and still eagerly anticipate each new publication
by these authors. Other readers might be
impressed by the use of these alternative
nouns or not even notice them. Whatever
your imperfection might be, never ever compound
it with sloppiness. You cannot help being
less than perfect, that is part of being
human; there is no excuse for offering sloppy
workmanship.
About the author:
This is one of a series of articles
published by the author, Elaine Currie,
BA(Hons)
at http://www.huntingvenus.com
The author's monthly newsletter is available
free
from mailto:networkerhvm@ReportsNetwork.com
Circulated by Bandoni
Media
|
|